I've discovered to my dismay lately that many writers are
not interested in telling a good story for the sake of telling it, they feel to
me like they are interested in telling a story in installment or
neverendingstory formats, both of which seem like nothing more than a
money-making proposition to me.
The first example is the installment story. You pay for your "book" and
download it to your reader, only to find it's not even novella length, and that
what should constitute a single book has been broken up into a
"series" of three or more installments, wherein the author wants you
to pay as much as you would for a single novel for every tiny segment of their
book. I've abandoned some good
storylines and left negative reviews for authors who use this ploy on me. I'm not cheap, but I do expect value for my
money spent, and if I'm paying for a book, I want a book, not something I can
read in less than an hour and which leaves many major plot points
unresolved. I've got nothing against
cliff-hanger stories, but I prefer that a writer is up front that they want to
tell you their story only a little bit at a time.
The opposite end of the spectrum is the neverendingstory. I've seen some series that are beyond epic
and into the realm of ridiculously long, where a single storyline that can and
should be told in one to three books is drawn out over nine books or more with
never a coherent stopping point seen.
IMO, it's nothing more than another rip-off, designed to get the reader
to continually shell out more money in hopes of getting a resolution to plot
points somewhere along the line. I feel
if your series is set in a coherent universe that ends up being popular with
readers, then you can tell more stories in the same setting rather than
dragging out a single plot line over multiple novels that have a lot of useless
filler in them. Granted, I can be wordy
(The Tourney is a whopping 125,860 words long as of the latest version), but I
can't see telling the same story over nine or more books.
No comments:
Post a Comment